Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 10:23
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
ESA signs agreement for potential use of Orbital Reef - SpaceNews
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The Best Deals Today: Pokémon TCG: Destined Rivals Crashes and More - IGN
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Has Pope Francis signed a document that gay men can now become priests?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
In NBA Finals, Thunder vs. Pacers reinvigorates league’s competitive soul - Andscape
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What are LGBT+ people tired of hearing?
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Northern Lights Could Be Visible Tonight From These States - Forbes